Amra's+assignment


 * __Bushwalkers __**

After many years of negotiation between the Walking Federations established in each State, Bushwalking Australia was formed in 2003. They work to ensure Australia is a pleasant, enjoyable, and safe place to walk for everyone. Bushwalking is the best way to see and be grateful for Australia's natural beauty, and a way people can enjoy that beauty without having to destroy it. We support State-based Walking Federations by negotiating with the Federal Government, other national organisations and increasing common policies. Bushwalking Australia does the things that can't be done by individuals and walking groups acting alone. There are a lot of issues that are affecting bushwalkers which extend beyond the boundaries of any one State or that require some level of support or national coordination. Some of these are protecting the natural environment, ensuring continued access to walking areas, operating a national insurance scheme, to protect walkers and walk leaders in the event of a mishap, encouraging people to lead walks and develop leadership skills without imposing unnecessary or inappropriate requirements on clubs, developing advice, guidelines and policies on a range of topics relevant to walking and liaising with government and non-government organisations at a national level.

Bushwalking is something everyone takes for granted like clean air and free speech. Their value is often not appreciated until people cannot do them. While several issues are restricted to a local area, they are often repeated in nearby areas. By joining together as a national organisation in Bushwalking Australia and increasing a common approach, we hope to avoid having to re-invent the same wheel numerous times over and over.

I am likely to agree with the bushwalker's point of view as our earth is being exaggerated by over-use of resources and the general over-consumption. Bush walkers think that keeping the environment free from human interference is indispensable. Land developers say that it is significant to exploit the land we have to recreate facilities and offer homes for people to enjoy. Those in the mining and timber industries maintain that the land should be used to supply the raw materials for the needs of technological progress. As we would all know, the Earth’s population is getting bigger, and in today’s society, it turns out people live in houses, so we need to construct these houses. Reasons for choosing the side of the land developers include the economy which definitely helps. It creates jobs which people need to build the facilities and houses which increase the worth of the land. Population rises and is developing, not alarmingly to any extent but it is happening and a way to support this is to build more places to live. Considering the fact that prices have gone up, in Australia July 2005-2010, the standard price of houses increased is 13%. Essentially the more houses there are, the less they will cost, helping more people and simple concept can be achieved by building more houses. Also all needs must be reached. If you said no for building more houses, it creates another issue and it doesn’t really solve anything. If we said no more preserving, bull doze every scrap of land there is, it does not solve anything as well and it creates a problem once again, same as the mining and timber industries. Land needs to be handled so that all three area needs are met and win situations that are in progress is what needs to be done. If you leave a nice green area, park, lake, etc. and make blocks of nice houses, it will then create popularity, preservation, and needs met. All three areas have needs, and they can be met when executed in moderation and consideration of the other side of things.